Winner 2001 - The IADR.CED Visiting Scholar Stipend
Zeynep Ergücü
2002 IADR-CED VISITING SCHOLAR STIPEND
Stipend Recipient :
Dr. Zeynep ERGÜCÜ, Izmir, TURKEY
Hosted by
:
Prof. Gottfried SCHMALZ , Regensburg, GERMANY
Duration of the stay: May 01st -November
01 st , 2002
Research
topics :
·
Effects of
dentin on the antibacterial activity of various dentin bonding agents
·
Monitoring
the cytotoxicity of composite luting cements in a dentin barrier test
Research
Methods :
· The antibacterial effects of Prime & Bond NT, Prime & Bond NT without fluoride, Gluma Comfort Bond, ABF, Xeno CF II, HEMA, TEGDMA and 0.2 % chlorhexidine (positive control) were tested against Streptococcus mutans, Streptococcus sobrinus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus using the standard agar diffusion method. Additionally, bovine dentin disks (200µm and 500µm thickness) were placed between the bacteria and the test substances. From dentin bonding agents the non-polymerized components, as well as the polymerized system were tested. After incubation for 24 h (S. mutans and S. sobrinus) or 48 h (L. acidophilus) at 37°C with 5 %CO2 the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured.
Three dimensional
cultures of SV40 transfected pulp derived cells were transferred into an in
vitro dentin barrier test device with dentin slices of 200 and 500 mm
thickness. After 24 h incubation at 37°C test materials were applied into the
cavity part of the device. Ceramic inserts (Cerafil, Brassler) were luted to the
dentin with (1) Variolink II/Excite (Vivadent) or (2) RelyX Unicem (3MEspe). A
light curing glass ionomer cement (Vitrebond, 3MEspe) was used as reference
material and an A-silicone impression material (President, Coltene) as negative
control (100% cell vitality). The pulpal part of the device was perfused with
cell culture medium. After 24h exposure, cell survival was measured by MTT tests,
and 10 cultures per material were statistically analyzed (Mann-Whitney-test, a=0.05).
Results
of the Studies:
It
was observed that dentin reduced the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine and
of dentin bonding agents significantly. The effect of the latter might
be considered to be limited to the superficial dentin after curing.
·
Cytotoxicity
of composite luting cements in a dentin barrier test
With
a residual dentin barrier of 500 mm
the tested composite luting cements may not alter biologically the dental pulp
on a short term basis. With a very thin dentin layer, both test materials
affected the cells with the self-adhesive material being less toxic and pulp
protection is still recommended.
Submitted Abstracts:
Two abstracts were
submitted for the 81st General Sesssion of the International
Association for the Dental Research (June 25-28, 2003, Göteborg, Sweden).
· Paper Submission # 2662 ( Abstract enclosed)
Effect of dentin on the
antibacterial activity of dentin bonding agents (G. Schmalz, Z. Ergücü, K.A.
Hiller)
· Paper Submission # 2391 (Abstract enclosed)
Cytotoxicity of
composite luting cements in a dentin barrier test (G. Schmalz, Z. Ergücü, K.A.
Hiller)
2662
Effect of Dentin on the Antibacterial Activity of Dentin Bonding Agents
G.
SCHMALZ1, Z. ERGUCU2,
and K.-A. HILLER1, 1 University of Regensburg, Germany, 2
Ege University, Bornova/Izmir, Turkey
Objectives:
The antibacterial activitiy of different dentin bonding agents was compared and
the effect of dentin on the antibacterial activity was evaluated.
Methods:
The antibacterial effects of Prime & Bond NT, Prime & Bond NT without
fluoride, Gluma Comfort Bond, ABF, Xeno CF II, HEMA, TEGDMA and 0.2 %
chlorhexidine (positive control) were tested against Streptococcus mutans,
Streptococcus sobrinus, and Lactobacillus acidophilus using the
standard agar diffusion method. Additionally, bovine dentin disks (200µm and
500µm thickness) were placed between the bacteria and the test substances. From
dentin bonding agents the non-polymerized components, as well as the polymerized
system were tested. After incubation for 24 h (S. mutans and S.
sobrinus) or 48 h (L. acidophilus) at 37°C with 5 %CO2
the diameters of the inhibition zones were measured.
Results:
Without dentin, ABF Primer showed growth inhibition for all bacterial strains
used. Xeno CF II inhibited the growth of S. mutans and S. sobrinus,
while Prime & Bond NT had an inhibitory effect on S. sobrinus only.
ABF Bonding inhibited colony formation of L. acidophilus. Prime
& Bond NT without fluoride, HEMA and TEGDMA did not have any antibacterial
effects in this test system. Dentin disks of 500µm thickness reduced the
inhibitory effect of chlorhexidine to 23-54 % compared to direct application.
ABF Primer (non-polymerized) produced inhibition zones against all tester
strains regardless of dentin disks interposed or not. Xeno CF II did not produce
any inhibition zones when applied on 200µm thick dentin. After polymerization,
the ABF system did not inhibit bacterial growth, if it was separated from the
bacteria by a dentin disk of only 200 µm.
Conclusions:
Dentin reduces
significantly the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine and of dentin bonding
agents and the effect of the latter may be considered to be limited to the
superficial dentin after curing.
81st General Session of the International Association for Dental Research
(June 25-28, 2003)
2391
Cytotoxicity of Composite Luting Cements in a Dentin Barrier Test
G.
SCHMALZ1,
Z. ERGÜCÜ2, and K.-A. HILLER1, 1 University
of Regensburg, Germany, 2 Ege Universitesi, Izmir, Turkey
Composite
luting cements are applied onto the cut dentin and thus the risk for the dental
pulp has to be assessed.
Objective:
To evaluate the
cytotoxicity of a new self-adhesive composite luting material containing new
monomers in comparison with a known material in a dentin barrier test simulating
the in vivo situation.
Methods:
Three dimensional cultures of SV40 transfected pulp derived cells (Schmalz et
al., J Dent Res 78: 522, 1999) were transferred into an in vitro dentin barrier
test device with dentin slices of 200 and 500 mm thickness. After 24 h incubation at 37°C test materials were applied
into the cavity part of the device. Ceramic inserts (Cerafil, Brassler) were
luted to the dentin with (1) Variolink II/Excite (Vivadent) or (2) RelyX Unicem
(3MEspe). A light curing glass ionomer cement (Vitrebond, 3MEspe) was used as
reference material and an A-silicone impression material (President, Coltene) as
negative control (100% cell vitality). The pulpal part of the device was
perfused with cell culture medium. After 24 h exposure, cell survival was
measured by MTT tests, and 10 cultures per material were statistically analyzed
(Mann-Whitney-test, a=0.05).
Results:
With 500 mm
dentin, cell survival rates for Variolink II/Excite (111%) and RelyX Unicem
(94%) were statistically not different from the negative control, but from the
reference material (75%). With 200 mm
dentin, cytotoxicity of all test materials significantly increased. Both luting
cements were significantly less toxic than the reference material (26%). RelyX
Unicem (77%) was significantly less toxic than Variolink II/Excite (56%).
Conclusions:
With a residual dentin barrier of 0.5 mm the tested composite luting cements may
not alter biologically the dental pulp on a short term basis. With a very thin
dentin layer, both test materials affected the cells with the self-adhesive
material being less toxic and pulp protection is still recommended.
81st General Session of the International Association for Dental Research
(June 25-28, 2003)